Hydraulics  Replace a Hydraulic Cylinder with a Threaded Drive?

Related Vendors

Kammerer Gewindetechnik GmbH & Co. KG

FAULHABER Drive Systems

Taiwan Machine Tool & Accessory Builders' Association (TMBA)

When should you use a hydraulic cylinder, and when should you use a lead screw? This question can only be answered by looking at the entire axis. 

The question of whether a hydraulic or an electromechanical drive is the better choice is now being asked more frequently in the design process. The reasons for this include increasing demands for energy efficiency, low-maintenance operation, and positioning accuracy, combined with servo drive technology that has become significantly more powerful and cost-effective in recent years.

Compare Properly: Systems, Not Components

Whether a ball screw can replace a hydraulic cylinder depends on the specific application and the load profile. A meaningful comparison begins with the system boundaries. After all, simply comparing a hydraulic cylinder to an electric cylinder amounts to comparing the smallest component of two very different systems. Only by considering the entire axis can energy consumption, installation space, maintenance requirements, and investment costs be meaningfully compared. At the heart of the electromechanical axis is the lead screw: It converts the motor’s rotation into linear motion and thus determines the efficiency, stiffness, positioning accuracy, and service life of the entire axis.

Efficiency and Energy Consumption

A precision-machined ball screw operates on rolling friction and typically achieves an efficiency of over 90 percent. A trapezoidal lead screw operates on sliding friction and, depending on the pitch and material pairing, has a significantly lower efficiency; however, it is self-locking at smaller pitches and holds the load without an energy supply.  

Hydraulic systems lose energy in several places at once: due to pump efficiency, throttling losses, leakage, and heat dissipation. In addition, many power units run continuously for response time reasons, even when the axle is at a standstill. The greater the proportion of downtime and partial-load operation, the greater the advantage of electromechanical systems.

When Hydraulic Cylinders Are the Right Choice

Hydraulic linear actuators remain the top choice in many applications. The following points are important when making design decisions:

• Very high peak forces with a short duty cycle: Hydraulics generate force through surface area and pressure, almost independently of time. A lead screw must transmit the same force via rolling contacts and the nut. Installation space and costs increase accordingly.
• Shock and overload conditions: Oil is compressible enough to absorb load spikes; pressure relief valves limit the force as an inherent feature of the system. A screw drive, on the other hand, requires a safety clutch, torque limiter, or a design with a margin above the static load capacity.
• Long holding periods under full load: Without a self-locking mechanism or holding brake, an electromechanical drive shaft holds the load—which is energetically and thermally inefficient—solely through motor torque.
• Harsh environments, high temperatures, vibrations: A cylinder can withstand conditions in which the motor, controller, and encoder require additional protective measures.
• Existing infrastructure: If the generator is already in place and supplying power to other axes, the cost-benefit analysis changes significantly.

What Electromechanics Does Better

Screw drives, as drive elements, offer the following advantages:

• Positioning Instead of Moving: Any intermediate position can be reached, is repeatable, and can be defined without mechanical stops.
• Force-Displacement Control: Joining, Pressing, Testing—Force and precision can be controlled simultaneously and documented as process data.
• Process Monitoring: Motor current and torque are process variables that can be measured directly. Condition monitoring is performed without the need for additional sensors.
• Cleanliness: No leaks, no hydraulic fluid. Electromechanical systems can be advantageous in medical technology, food production, and cleanroom environments. 
• Estimated Service Life: The service life of a rolling-element system can be estimated mathematically based on the load rating and load profile.

The Transition Should Not Be Underestimated

A hydraulic cylinder cannot be replaced one-to-one with an electromechanical axis. Anyone making the switch must redesign the axis. These questions determine the outcome: What does the actual load profile look like? What is the duty cycle? How does the peak load relate to the static load rating? How long is the stroke? How is the load held in place when the system is at rest? What disturbances affect the axis? Does the connection geometry fit?

Once these questions have been clarified, the actual design work begins. The screw drive determines not only the force-displacement characteristics of the drive, but also its efficiency, service life, self-locking behavior, and achievable accuracy.

When high demands are placed on positioning accuracy, dynamics, and energy efficiency, the ball screw is the preferred drive element. Efficiency levels of up to 96 percent make it possible to move heavy payloads using small motors. Typical applications include machine tools, presses and forming machines, automated material handling, and medical technology.

The trapezoidal thread drive has lower efficiency and is self-locking when the pitch is sufficiently shallow. Trapezoidal thread drives are more robust under transverse loads, less expensive to purchase, and less sensitive to dirt and contamination. Typical applications include lifting systems with a holding function, actuators, or feed units that do not require high dynamic performance.

Linear Technology and Material Handling

Seven New Products All at Once

When is it Worth Switching from Hydraulics to Electromechanics?

The question of cost-effectiveness depends on the application. Based on the technical parameters, the following decision-making criteria can be identified:

Electromechanical systems are often preferable when positioning accuracy is less than 0.5 mm or reproducible force-displacement profiles are required; operation takes place in hygienically sensitive environments; low energy consumption over the life cycle is critical; flexibility is required for recipe changes or parameterization; or leak prevention is relevant from a design or regulatory perspective.

Hydraulics remain the better choice when very high forces must be applied within a very small installation space; when sudden load spikes or pressure surges are expected; when the budget for drive technology is strictly limited; and when positioning accuracy is not a critical factor.

Summary

The question is which application benefits from which principle. Hydraulics remains superior in applications where maximum power density, shock resistance, and ruggedness are the deciding factors. However, where positioning accuracy, energy efficiency, process data, and cleanliness are important, the electromechanical axis with a well-designed lead screw is the more cost-effective solution.